SCET Journal 2020/2021

Language Matters »

REFERENCES

Anzul, M; Evans, J. F., King, R., & Tellier-Robinson, D. (2001). Moving beyond a deficit perspective with qualitative research methods. Exceptional Children , 67 (2), 235-249.

Johnson, P., & Keier, K. (2010). Catching readers before they fall: Supporting readers who struggle , K-4. Stenhouse Publishers.

Kabuto, B. (2017). A socio-psycholinguistic perspective on biliteracy: The use of miscue analysis as a culturally relevant assessment tool. Reading Horizons : A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts , 56 (1). Retrieved from https://scholarworks. wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol56/iss1/2. MacSwan, J. (2000). The threshold hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences , 22 (1), 3-45. Moore, R., & Gilles, C. (2005). Reading conversations: Retrospective miscue analysis with struggling readers , grades 4-12. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Ching, D. C. (1965). Methods for the bilingual child. Elementary English Elementary School Journal , 42 , 22– 27.

Cummins, J. (2003). Challenging the construction of difference as deficit: Where are identity, intellect, imagination, and power in the new regime of truth? In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Pedagogies of difference (pp. 41-60). New York: Routledge Falmer. Flores, B., Cousin, P. T., & Diaz, E. (1991). Transforming deficit myths about learning, language, and culture. Language Arts , 68 (5), 369-379. Fránquiz, M. E., Salazar, M. D. C., & DeNicolo, C. P. (2011). Challenging majoritarian tales: Portraits of bilingual teachers deconstructing deficit views of bilingual learners. Bilingual Research Journal , 34 (3), 279-300. Goodman, K. (1966) On reading: A common-sense look at the nature of language and the science of reading. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann. Goodman, Y. (1996). Revaluing readers while readers revalue themselves: Retrospective miscue analysis. The Reading Teacher , 49 , 600-609. Goodman, Y. M., Watson, D; & Burke, C. (2005). Reading miscue inventory: From evaluation to instruction . (2nd ed.). New York: Richard C. Owens. Goodman, K. (1965). A linguistic study of cues and miscues in reading. Elementary English , 42 (6), 639-643.

Reading A to Z. (2021) retrieved from https://www.readinga-z. com/

Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2017). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Wang, Y., & Gilles, C. (2017). Reading in English and in Chinese: Case study of retrospective miscue analysis with two adult English learners. Reading Horizons , 56 (2), 64.

Weaver, C. (Ed.). (1998). Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Wilde, S. (2000). Miscue analysis made easy: Building on student strengths . Portsmouth: Heinemann.

j Katherine Eliana Agudelo-Roberson has been a language educator for 15 years. She is now teaching at the elementary school level. She is also a full time Ph.D. student in the Language and Literacy program in the College of Education at the University of South Carolina. Currently her research focuses on critical and cultural literacies, foreign language pedagogy, bilingualism and multicultural education.

2020/2021

27

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS