Reading Matters Winter 2019

Jackson, A. (2015, April 3). 4 reasons Finland’s schools are better. Business Insider . Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/4-things-finlands-schools-do- better-than-america-2015-4

OECD. (2002). PISA 2000 technical report . R. Adams & M. Wu (Eds.). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2004). Me read? No way!: A practical guide to improving boys’ literacy skills . Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Retrieved October 27, 2017, from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/brochure/ meread/meread.pdf Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Me read? And how?: Ontario teachers report on how to improve boys’ literacy skills . Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Retrieved October 27, 2017, from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/ meRead_andHow.pdf

Kirkland, D. E. (2013). A search past silence: The literacy of young black men. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Klages, C., Pate, S., & Conforti Jr, P. A. (2007). Virtual literature Circles. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue , 9 .

Reading Matters Choice Matters

Klein, R. (2015, March 24). Young girls are much, much better readers than boys, and have been for a long time. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www. huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/24/gender-reading-gap_n_6926028.html Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2015, June 3). Researching and understanding new literacies from a social languages perspective. Opening Keynote paper presented to the Futuuri! Language Summer School and the Language Centre Conference, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. (2003). Gender differences in patterns of searching the web. Journal of educational computing research , 29 (3), 335-348.

Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Trendtel, M. (2015). The school age gender gap in reading achievement: Examining the influences of item format and intrinsic reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly , 50 (2), 219-232.

Langer, J.A. (2011). Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Simpson, A. (1996). Fictions and facts: An investigation of the reading practices of girls and boys. English Education , 28 (4), 268-279.

Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. The Reading Teacher , 64 (1), 15-22.

Sqire, K. (2005). Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom?. Innovate: Journal of online education , 1 (6), 5.

Logan, S., & Medford, E. (2011). Gender differences in the strength of association between motivation, competency beliefs and reading skill. Educational Research, 53 (1), 85-94. Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32 (2), 199-214. Loveless, T. (2015). How well are American students learning? With sections on the gender gap in reading, effects of the Common Core, and student engagement. The 2015 Brown Center Report on American Education, 3 (4).

Stillwell, R. (2010). Public school graduates and dropouts from the common of data: School year 2007-08. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http:// nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010341.pdf

Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography, and education . London, UK: Longman.

Thoermer, A., &Williams, L. (2012). Using digital texts to promote fluent reading. The Reading Teacher , 65 (7), 441-445.

Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49 (2), 129-141.

Tung, S. (2012, January 20). How the Finnish school system outshines U.S. education. Stanford News. Retrieved from https://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/ january/finnish-schools-reform-012012.html

Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: Evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education , 34 (1), 89-109. doi:10.1080/03054980701565279.

Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140 , 1174-1204.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 technical report . Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., &Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: does sex or gender identity provide a better account?. Journal of Research in Reading, 35 (3), 328-336.

Watson, A. (2011). Not just a ‘boy problem’: an exploration of the complexities surrounding literacy under-achievement. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32 (5), 779-795. Watson, A., & Kehler, M. (2012). Beyond the“boy problem”: Raising questions, growing concerns and literacy reconsidered. New England Reading Association Journal , 48 (1), 43-55.

Merisuo-Storm, T. (2006). Girls and boys like to read and write different texts. Scandinavian Journal of educational research , 50 (2), 111-125.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_303.70.asp

| 12 | Reading Matters | Volume 19 • Winter 2019 | scira.org

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS