APS_April 2023

107 B lueberry Table 1. Firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TTA), and sugar to acid ratio 274 (TSS:TTA) of fruit harvested from grafted and own-rooted ‘Patrecia’ SHB grown in a minimally 275 amended field in Citra, FL. 276 Table 1. Firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TTA), and sugar to acid ratio (TSS:TTA) of fruit harvested from grafted and own-rooted ‘Patrecia’ SHB grown in a minimally amended field in Citra, FL.

Firmness (N)

TSS (%) Season

TTA

TSS:TTA

Treatment Z

Year

Season

Season

Season

Early 2.65 2.92 2.63 2.76

Late 2.44 2.57 2.44 2.44

Early 10.78 10.72 11.14 11.36 15.04 15.92 22.96 16.00

Late 12.36 11.92 12.20 12.06 0.5182 0.4657 11.22 11.42 12.04 12.64 0.07174 0.07128

Early

Late 0.55 0.48 0.52 0.48 1.02 1.29 1.74 1.56

Early 20.46 20.34 21.37 21.54 49.32 16.87 29.17 23.82

Late 22.63 29.40 21.12 28.36 0.1703 0.1176 13.82

R1 R2 R3

0.48 0.52 0.61 0.57 0.80 0.73 1.23 1.02

2021

Control

p-value ANOVA 0.1654

0.1754 0.1476 1.87 b y 1.89 b 1.99 b 2.23 a 0.0057 0.0126

0.2824 0.2411

0.345 0.788 0.162 0.765

0.9546 0.7957

p-value KW

0.1997

R1 R2 R3

2.22 2.24 2.39 2.38

9.63 7.41 8.72

2022

Control

p-value ANOVA 0.1829

0.2444 0.3371

0.709 0.121 0.446 0.159

0.1674

0.2771 0.4282

p-value KW

0.2055

0.176

277 z Control = own-rooted ‘Patrecia’. R1, R2, R3 = ‘Patrecia’ grafted on Rootstock 1, Rootstock 2, 278 or Rootstock 3, respectively. 279 y Means within columns and year followed by common letters do not differ at the pair-wise error 280 rate of 5%, by LSD. z Control = own-rooted ‘Patrecia’. R1, R2, R3 = ‘Patrecia’ grafted on Rootstock 1, Rootstock 2, or Rootstock 3, respectively. y Means within columns and year followed by common letters do not differ at the pair-wise error rate of 5%, by LSD.

plants was softer than fruit from the own rooted controls, and a general decrease in berry firmness was observed with late-season berries for all treatments in both years. Even with lower firmness in 2022, values were still considered acceptable for marketable blueberry fruit. Ehlenfeldt and Martin (2002) considered values greater than 1.57 N as be ing very good two decades ago. Nowadays, new cultivars are expected to have firmness not lower than 1.47 N (Cappai et al., 2018). ‘Patrecia’ (released in 2016) has an expected firmness of 2.07 – 2.6 N with an average 2.27

N (Munoz, 2016), which the berries from all treatments achieved in 2021. In 2022, only berries from control plants had average firm ness close to that expected for ‘Patrecia’ in late season. Previous studies reported the same pattern of reduced firmness on grafted blueberry plants (Casamali et al., 2016a). Grafted plants produced larger berries, which tend to be less firm. Internal fruit quality. Internal fruit quality was determined by total soluble solids (TSS), total titratable acidity (TTA), and maturation index (TSS:TTA), which define the percep

281 282 283 284 285 286

304 Figure 3. Average berry weight of grafted and own-rooted ‘Patrecia’ SHB grown in a minimally 305 amended field in Citra, FL. Control = own-rooted ‘Patrecia’. R1, R2, R3 = ‘Patrecia’ grafted on 306 Rootstock 1, Rootstock 2, or Rootstock 3, respectively. Boxes topped by the same letter were 307 not significantly different according to the least significant difference test at P < 0.05, by LSD. Figure 3. Average berry weight of grafted and own-rooted ‘Patrecia’ SHB grown in a minimally amended field in Citra, FL. Control = own-rooted ‘Patrecia’. R1, R2, R3 = ‘Patrecia’ grafted on Rootstock 1, Rootstock 2, or Rootstock 3, respectively. Boxes topped by the same letter were not significantly ifferent ccording to the least significant difference test at P < 0.05, by LSD.

308 309

Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog