fall-2017-final

Table 2. United States’ Mathematical Sciences Doctorates: Females Compared to White Males 2005-2014

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Total (M/W)

540

583

645

671

788

863

849

852

912

948

Total Women

152

151

193

218

235

245

230

224

242

254

Black

9

5

5

11

16

9

9

10

6

9

Hispanic or Latino

6

11

4

5

12

8

9

11

6

7

Native American

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

White

101

102

132

161

154

168

155

163

170

179

Asian

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

38

22

34

32

Asian or Pacific Islander

26

20

29

24

27

39

NA

NA

NA

NA

Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

0

0

0

0

Other

10

13

22

17

25

21

18

15

22

22

Two or More Races

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

1

4

3

4

Total Men

388

432

452

453

553

618

619

628

670

694

Source: Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017 (table 7-7)

education experiences. It is not just a Virginia problem; it is a national problem. Black girls’ ex- periences in mathematics remain invisible and largely untheorized and this invisibility produces obscurity to most mathematics teachers; conse- quently, program and learning design efforts re- main non-existent. Interventions that are put in place are usually single-axis and assume that either all girls or all African-American students have the same needs. Intersectional interventions can pro- vide promise for Black girls and other racialized minorities. Such interventions would not only take into account Black girls’ particular learning needs for persistence in mathematics (Joseph, Hailu, & Boston, 2017), they would also account for issues of power, oppression, and center social justice (Collins & Bilge, 2016). Understanding Black girls’ experiences in mathematics during their K-12 trajectories can shed light on their underrepresentation in higher educa- tion majors and careers that require mathematics degrees. For example, studies have shown that Black girls have higher mathematics career aspira-

tions than their White and Latina female peers (Riegle-Crumb, Moore, & Ramos-Wada, 2011), yet, few make it to the doctoral level. Table 2 shows the number of mathematics doctorates awarded to American citizens over the last 10 years. What we notice is that over the last 10 years, White males earned roughly 75% of the mathemat- ics doctorate degrees in comparison to all women. We also notice that in 2014, all women, with ra- cialized women yielding eight percent, and Black women roughly one percent, earned 27% of the math doctorates. These numbers can be explained by several factors; here, I discuss a few. We know from thirty years of research by Jeannie Oakes (1985, 1990a, 1990b) that mathematics tracking substantially limits African-American students’ access to ad- vanced mathematics courses. Mathematics tracking is the process of organizing students into mathe- matics courses that are based on their ability, and it has been an accepted practice in U.S. schools for nearly a century (Rubin, 2008). Teachers’ low expectations and overall

Virginia Mathematics Teacher vol. 44, no. 1

22

Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker